Category Archives: Durst Firm News

Listen to Divorce 101 brought to you by Sandy Durst & The Durst Firm

Several months ago I began hosting a radio show called Divorce 101 on 920 AM, The Voice.  Divorce 101 is intended to offer general legal information on NJ divorce and family law topics. From time to time there are guests … Continue reading

Posted in Durst Firm News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Listen to Divorce 101 brought to you by Sandy Durst & The Durst Firm

Tips on how to control your legal fees during your divorce.

    Controlling your Legal Fees   The divorce process may be the first time you have worked with an attorney on an hourly basis. It is our goal to provide you with the highest quality legal services in the … Continue reading

Posted in Durst Firm News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Tips on how to control your legal fees during your divorce.

NJ Supreme Court preserves pre-2010 palimony claims

On September 25, 2014 the New Jersey Supreme Court clarified the law on the issue of palimony in the state of New Jersey when they rendered their decision in the matter of Maeker v. Ross. While many practitioners will be familiar … Continue reading

Posted in Durst Firm News | Comments Off on NJ Supreme Court preserves pre-2010 palimony claims

Oral palimony agreements may still be valid & binding

As yesterday’s post indicated, the NJ Supreme Court was scheduled to release its decision in the case of Maeker v. Ross today.  Just moments ago, the decision was released and it is a reasonable, logical and fair opinion.  While a … Continue reading

Posted in Durst Firm News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Oral palimony agreements may still be valid & binding

NJ Supreme Court to clarify the law on palimony

Palimony – financial support when the parties are not married – is an available claim under NJ law.  However, the right was greatly restricted by an amendment to the statute of frauds which required a written document or agreement in … Continue reading

Posted in Durst Firm News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on NJ Supreme Court to clarify the law on palimony