{"id":905,"date":"2012-10-12T14:30:56","date_gmt":"2012-10-12T14:30:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=905"},"modified":"2012-10-04T14:34:37","modified_gmt":"2012-10-04T14:34:37","slug":"nj-court-expands-protection-under-domestic-violence-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=905","title":{"rendered":"NJ Court expands protection under domestic violence law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The NJ domestic violence law has once again been interpreted to provide protection to residents in an ever growing list of living arrangements.\u00a0 While I certainly commend goal of protecting citizens from domestic violence, I must wonder whether this recent expansion is truly in keeping with the original purpose and intention of the\u00a0Prevention Of\u00a0Domestic Violence Act.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.com\/jsp\/nj\/PubArticleNJ.jsp?id=1202572985303\">DOMESTIC-VIOLENCE LAW APPLIES TO BOARDING HOUSES, COURT HOLDS<br \/>\n<\/a><\/strong>Rooming-house residents may be considered members of the same household for purposes of the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, a state appeals court ruled Thursday in the case of a woman allegedly raped by a boarder. &#8220;The PDVA aims to protect those living in family or family-like settings,&#8221; Appellate Division Judge Francine Axelrad wrote for the panel in <em>S.P. v. Newark Police Department<\/em>, A-5591-10, adding that courts have liberally construed the term &#8220;household member&#8221; in the act. The plaintiff and her assailant met the broad and flexible interpretation of the term &#8220;household member&#8221; because they lived on the same floor, with bedrooms directly across from each other, and a shared bathroom and kitchen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The NJ domestic violence law has once again been interpreted to provide protection to residents in an ever growing list of living arrangements.\u00a0 While I certainly commend goal of protecting citizens from domestic violence, I must wonder whether this recent &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=905\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[28,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-905","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-durstfirm-news","category-durst-on-divorce"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6omM8-eB","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":994,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=994","url_meta":{"origin":905,"position":0},"title":"No right to appointed counsel in NJ Domestic Violence cases","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"January 28, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported in the NJ Law Journal, litigants in family court domestic violence cases do not have a right to court appointed attorneys.\u00a0 Given that the consequences of a domestic violence hearing can be significant - no matter what side of the case you may find yourself - retaining the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1380,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=1380","url_meta":{"origin":905,"position":1},"title":"Appellate Court explains necessary findings for a domestic violence case","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"May 9, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Under NJ law, issues of domestic violence are taken seriously and are decided in accordance with the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act.\u00a0 When deciding whether an act of domestic violence occurred and whether a restraining order is necessary to protect the victim, there are many factors for the court to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2706,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=2706","url_meta":{"origin":905,"position":2},"title":"If I didn&#8217;t get hit, is it still domestic violence?","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"September 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The immediate answer is a definitive YES. Many people are under the false impression that domestic violence requires physical violence for the Court to protect the victim by entering a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or a Final Restraining Order (FRO). It is important for both sides - the victim and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":911,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=911","url_meta":{"origin":905,"position":3},"title":"Prior history of Domestic Violence not proper basis to issue a restraining order","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"October 15, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"When a victim of domestic violence is seeking a restraining order, NJ courts are required to examine the acts or acts which prompted the request for a temporary restraining order as well as the past history of domestic violence, if any exists.\u00a0 The prior acts do not have to have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":831,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=831","url_meta":{"origin":905,"position":4},"title":"Intent to harm is required for a finding of domestic violence","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"August 4, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 Here is a case that brings some clarity to the often muddy waters of NJ domestic violence law.\u00a0 The law rightfully recognizes that couples may often have legitmate reasons to argue and that not all fights warrant a finding of domestic violence even when there is a physical altercation.\u00a0\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1178,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=1178","url_meta":{"origin":905,"position":5},"title":"NJ Appellate Court appears to modify DV law","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"September 1, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"In a recent unreported decision, the NJ Appellate Division authored the opinion summarized below.\u00a0 What is interesting about this decision is the additional requirement that the trial judge must determine if other forms of relief are available in the pending divorce case that could\u00a0eliminate the need for a restraining order.\u00a0\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=905"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":906,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905\/revisions\/906"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}