{"id":1008,"date":"2013-02-14T21:02:15","date_gmt":"2013-02-15T02:02:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=1008"},"modified":"2013-02-13T13:49:13","modified_gmt":"2013-02-13T18:49:13","slug":"1008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=1008","title":{"rendered":"Making relocation easier. Is this a positive trend?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a continuing stream of court opinions that appear to make it easier for a custodial parent to relocate outside the borders of New Jersey with the children, an unreported decision remanded a relocation case back to the trial judge so that a plenary hearing could be held.  Such a hearing was necessary given the competing factual allegations in the certifications submitted by each party. The trial court judge originally decided to deny the relocation request because the proposed move would have had an unacceptably negative impact on the father&#8217;s parenting time.  While I disagree with the tone of this decision, it signifies a shift in the law.<\/p>\n<p><strong>FAMILY LAW<\/strong><br \/>\n20-2-8964 <em>Loos v. Brown, <\/em>App. Div. (per curiam) (6 pp.) The appellate panel reverses a family judge&#8217;s determination \u2014 reached without benefit of an evidentiary hearing and in the face of competing certifications \u2014 that prohibited the primary custodial parent&#8217;s (mother) removal of the parties&#8217; child from New Jersey to North Dakota. In denying relief, the trial judge placed too much weight on the impact removal would have on the father&#8217;s rights and interests. The judge should not have assigned weight to any of the circumstances contained in the parties&#8217; competing certifications because the facts were largely disputed. The judge should have recognized that the mother had satisfied the burden of presenting a prima facie case, placing the burden of going forward on the father to &#8220;produce evidence opposing the move as either not in good faith or inimical to the child&#8217;s interest.&#8221; Once the mother presented a prima facie case, the judge should have scheduled an evidentiary hearing to resolve the parties&#8217; many factual disputes. The panel remands for an evidentiary hearing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a continuing stream of court opinions that appear to make it easier for a custodial parent to relocate outside the borders of New Jersey with the children, an unreported decision remanded a relocation case back to the trial judge &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=1008\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[28,27],"tags":[29,32,44],"class_list":["post-1008","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-durstfirm-news","category-durst-on-divorce","tag-divorce","tag-durst","tag-relocation"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s6omM8-1008","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":893,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=893","url_meta":{"origin":1008,"position":0},"title":"NJ Appellate Court clarifies law on relocating out of state with a child","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"September 10, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"As today's society becomes increasingly mobile, divorce parents often find that the need to move from New Jersey after their divorce has been finalized. The need to move can arise due to\u00a0a new job offer, remarriage, or the need to become a caretaker for elderly parents.\u00a0 Under NJ law, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2029,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=2029","url_meta":{"origin":1008,"position":1},"title":"My divorce is done. Can I move out of NJ with our child?","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"February 5, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Once a divorce is completed, many clients are ready to establish a new life and move on from the divorce process. One way people try to begin a new is to establish a new residence. \u00a0Sometimes they want this new home to be outside of New Jersey. If there are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst on Divorce&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst on Divorce","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=27"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/thedurstfirm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/img_1354.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1004,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=1004","url_meta":{"origin":1008,"position":2},"title":"Court eases burden for a parent seeking to relocate out of NJ with the children","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"February 12, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"In today's mobile society\u00a0 \u00a0in which both parents work it has become increasingly likely that the custodial parent may need t relocate outside of New Jersey.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Generally, the custodial parent cannot move out of New Jersey without the consent of the other parent or a court order permitting the move.\u00a0\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1903,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=1903","url_meta":{"origin":1008,"position":3},"title":"What is a NJ Child Support Hearing Officer?","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"November 27, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The first time may potential client's contat The Durst Firm is when they have unexpectedly received a notice from Family Court requring them to report on a specific date to appear before a Child Support Hearing Officer. So what is a Child Support Hearing Officer? Simply put, a Child Support\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst on Divorce&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst on Divorce","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=27"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1178,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=1178","url_meta":{"origin":1008,"position":4},"title":"NJ Appellate Court appears to modify DV law","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"September 1, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"In a recent unreported decision, the NJ Appellate Division authored the opinion summarized below.\u00a0 What is interesting about this decision is the additional requirement that the trial judge must determine if other forms of relief are available in the pending divorce case that could\u00a0eliminate the need for a restraining order.\u00a0\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":868,"url":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?p=868","url_meta":{"origin":1008,"position":5},"title":"WHAT IS A MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF?","author":"Sandy Durst","date":"August 16, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"WHAT IS A MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF? \u00a0In New Jersey, the family court system is instructed to do all it can to resolve divorce cases within one year of the filing of a Complaint for Divorce.\u00a0 Depending on a particular case, this can seem like a very quick or painfully\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Durst Firm News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Durst Firm News","link":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/?cat=28"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1008","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1008"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1008\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1010,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1008\/revisions\/1010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedurstfirm.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}